The EU superstate, established in December 2009, is now the ruling force in the lives of 27 formerly independent European nations. Few know of this, so get the facts here.

LISBON’S CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION BY STEALTHBY ANTHONY COUGHLAN The Lisbon Treaty is aconstitutional revolution by stealth. With the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty on Tuesday 1 December, members of the European Parliament, who up tonow have been "representatives of the peoples of the States brought together in the Community"(Art.189 TEC),become "representatives of the Union's citizens" (Art.14 TEU). This change in the status of MEPs is but one illustration of the constitutional revolution being brought about by the Lisbon Treaty. For Lisbon, like the EU Constitution before it, establishes for the first time a European Union which is constitutionallyseparate from and superior to its member states, just as the USA is separate from and superior to its 50 constituentstates or as Federal Germany is in relation to its Länder. The 27 EU members thereby lose their character as true sovereign States. Constitutionally, they become more like regional states in a multinational Federation, although they still retain some of the trappings of their former sovereignty.Simultaneously, 500 million Europeans become real citizens of the constitutionally new post-Lisbon European Union, with real citizens' rights and duties with regard to this EU, as compared with the merelynotional or symbolical EU citizenship they are assumedto have possessed up to now. Most Europeans are unaware of these astonishing changes, for two reasons. One is that, with the exception of the Irish, they have been denied any chance of learning about and debating them in national referendums. The other is that the terms "European Union", "EU citizen" and "EU citizenship" remain the same before and after Lisbon, although Lisbon changes their constitutional content fundamentally. The Lisbon Treaty therefore is a constitutional revolution by stealth. A constitutionally new European Union.The EU Constitution, which the peoples of France and Holland rejected in 2005, sought to establish anew European Union in the constitutional form of a Federation directly. Its first article stated: "This Constitutionestablishes the European Union". That would clearly have been a European Union with a different constitutional basis from the EU that had been set up by the Maastricht Treaty 13 years before.Lisbon brings a constitutionally new Union into being indirectly rather than directly, by amending the two existing European Treaties instead of replacing them entirely, as the earlier Constitutional Treaty had sought to do. Thus Lisbon states: "TheUnion shall be founded on the present Treaty" - "complementing" national citizenship, as under the present Maastricht Treaty-based EU (Art.17 TEC), which makes such citizenship essentially symbolical. Lisbon provides that EU citizenship shall be "additional to" national citizenship. This is a real dual citizenship - not of two different States, but of two different levels of one State. One can only be a citizen of a State and all States must have citizens. Dual citizenship like that provided for in Lisbon is normal in classical Federations which have been established from the bottom up by constituent states surrendering their sovereignty to a superior federal entity, in contrast to federations that have come into being "top-down", as it were, as a result of unitary states adopting federal form. Examples of the former are the USA, 19^th Century Germany, Switzerland, Canada and Australia. Lisbon would confer a threefold citizenship on citizens of Federal Germany's Länder. Being a citizen means that one must obey the law and give loyalty to the authority of the State one is a citizen of - in the case of classical Federations, of the two state levels, the federal and the regional or provincial. In the post-Lisbon EU the rights and duties attaching to citizenship of the Union will be superior to those attaching to one's national citizenship in any case of conflict between the two, because of the superiority of Union law over national law and Constitutions (Declaration No 17 concerning Primacy). The EU will be constitutionally superior even though the powers of the new Union come from its member states in accordance with the "principle of conferral" (Art.5 TEU). Where else could it get its powers from? This is so eventhough the member states retain their national constitutions and their citizens keep their national citizenships. The local states of the USA retain their different state constitutions and citizenships, even though both are subordinate to America's Federal Constitution in any case of conflict between the two. The tenth amendment to the US Constitution alludes to the principle of conferral when it lays down that powers not delegated to the US Federation"are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people". Likewise, it is not unusual for the constitutions of classical federations to provide for a right of withdrawal for their constituent states, just as the Lisbon Treaty does (Art.50 TEU). The existence of these features in the Constitution of the post-Lisbon European Union does not take away from its federal character. An alternative source of democratic legitimacy to the Nation State. Under Lisbon population size will in turn become the primary basis for EU law-making, as in any State with a common citizenry. This will happen after 2014, when the treaty provision comes into force that EU laws will be made by 55% of Member States as long as they represent 65% of the total population of the Union. Lisbon provides an alternative source of democratic legitimacy which challenges the right of national governments to be the representatives of their electorates in the EU. The amended Treaty provides: "The functioning of the Union shall be founded on representative democracy. Citizens are directly represented at union level in the European Parliament. Member states are represented in the European Council by their Heads of State or Government and in the Council by their governments..."(Art.10 TEU). Contrast this with what is stated to be the foundation of the present Mastricht Treaty-based EU (Art.6 TEU): "The Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the MemberStates." The constitutional structure of the post-Lisbon EU is completed by the provision which turns the EuropeanCouncil of Prime Ministers and Presidents into an "institution" of the new Union (Art.13 TEU), so that its acts or its failing to act would, like those of the other Union institutions, be subject to legal review by the EU Court of Justice. Constitutionally speaking, the summit meetings of the European Council will henceforth no longer be "intergovernmental" gatherings outside supranational European structures, as they have beenup to now. The European Council will in effect be the Cabinet Government of the post-Lisbon Union. Its individual members will be constitutionally obliged to represent the Union to their Member States as well as their Member States to the Union, with the former function imposing primacy of obligation in any case of conflict or tension between the two. One doubts if all the Heads of State or Government who make up the European Council themselvesappreciate this! As regards the State authority of the post- Lisbon Union, this will be embodied in the Union's own executive, legislative and judicial institutions: the European Council, Council of Ministers, Commission,Parliament and Court of Justice. It will be embodied also in the member states and their authorities as they implement and apply EU law and interpret and apply national law in conformity with union law. Member states will be constitutionally required to do this under the Lisbon Treaty. Thus EU "State authorities" as represented for example by EU soldiers and policemen patrolling our streets in EU uniforms, will not be needed as such. Although the Lisbon Treaty has given the EU a Federal-style Constitution without most people noticing, they are bound to find out in time and react against what is being done. There is no European people or demos which could give democratic legitimacy to the institutions the Lisbon Treaty establishes and make people identify with these as they do with the institutions of their home countries. This is the core problem of the EU integration project. Lisbon in effect has made the EU's democratic deficit much worse. It is hard to imagine that this EU Constituton by stealth will not make struggles to re-establish national independence and democracy and to repatriate supranational powers back to the member states the central issue of EU politics in the years and decades ahead. Anthony Coughlan is Director of the NationalPlatform EU Research and Information Centre,Dublin, and President of the Foundation for EUDemocracy, Brussels. He is Senior Lecturer Emeritusin Social Policy at Trinity College Dublin. He maybe contacted at 00-353-1-8305792.